I've been reading Donald Barthelme again. Read him in college and love his play with language. It frees me up as a writer to see that a "story" can be forged by the connection between phrases and not just plot points. A while ago, I took a playwriting workshop with Maria Irene Fornes, who in a nutshell imagines characters and then "bumps" a scene with a phrase she has imagined or overheard. On my walk Saturday, I overheard an older man say to an even older man who had stopped to talk while the other did yard work, "Skipper's not going to do the Mack next year. So he might have more time." It sounded like a line right out of Barthelme. It also sounded like a good line for a start to a scene or story. I haven't worked it up yet, but offer it for any other writers who may want it. I know enough to parse its meaning. It's about an annual sailing race from Chicago to Mackinac Island. But without that context, it is delightful to hear and to imagine what else it might be about. And who the hell is Skipper? 
These things seem too musical to be real, but are often from life itself. I once asked a cabbie his problems because, like a bartender, people usually tell cabbies their problems. The cabbie licked his gums and growled, "the usual: tryin' to make the nut." If I had written that line, critics might have said it seemed a cliché of cabbies. Yet there I was hearing it in the twenty-first century.
Part of what self-publishing in this blog can do is bypass such critics, but also put these ideas out there for other writers who might work them up before I do. I tend to be an idea guy and more focused on short sketch-ups than fleshed out works. I always fantasized than my journals would be published after my novels. (Ha!) Well, again, like with my Hopper book, I am self-publishing my journals. You might find stuff in here from a while ago, but it will all be things that I feel the thoughts or feelings are still worthwhile.

Many people's journals, essays, or nonfiction have been inspirational to me: Andre Gide, Bruce Chatwin, Ned Rorem, etc. I wanted to be part of that tradition. I think my writings can inspire the right people. Back when I was trying to publish the mainstream way, I one night went to Chicago's Quimby's Queer Store, looking for zines that might want my reviews. I found many that disappointed. But one stood out: h2so4. I sent a piece to the editor, who liked it and asked for more. That began a several-year working relationship. I liked the other writers in that zine, and they liked my stuff. I realized that I had found my audience, and that it was small. Like they say, "Love is blind," and what are you going to do if you find your true love and he or she is physically challenged or always has toothpaste on the corner of their mouth in the morning? Nobody's perfect, but the one(s) meant for you are meant for you: "for better or for worse."
So I realized that traditional paper publishing routes were probably not going to work for me. Thus, fame and wealth were also probably not going to follow soon. But I still felt I had something to offer the stream of literature. (A friend once described literature as a pond fed by many streams: no matter how small your stream, you were contributing to the pond.) Something Americans rarely think about. They're so obsessed with breaking traditions that they don't even realize that breaking traditions is PART of the tradition. How do you fit in? Many tradition-breakers have been flash-in-the-pans. And I don't think that anyone who dreams of writing fame wants posterity to view them that way.
* * *
Another idea I got for a story was when I passed a ramp up a house's front stairs. I passed a house with a wheelchair elevator on its front steps. It was permanently attached and had a fold-out seat. I could imagine local kids joyriding it late one night. The immediate instinct is to make it then malfunction when the handicapped person needs it. But then it turns into a morality play. Joseph Campbell nicely summarized American literature as "moral pornography." The money shot is when the bad guy gets his just desserts. But that rarely happens in life.* * *
I watched the New Yorkification of Chicago, and it drove me out. So I went looking for apartments in Evanston, where I had gone to Northwestern University 20 years earlier and found that the Chicagoization of Evanston had occurred in the meantime. I ended up getting a place north of that in Wilmette. Now I slowly see the Evanstoning of Wilmette. In my first city election, I went online and saw each candidate's statement. It was amazing how they all said that the "real estate" along the Metra tracks needed to be developed. There is an unquestioned knee jerk response in the U.S. that "real estate" (space) needs to be "developed" (filled). The major justification each candidate gave was that the downturn in the economy meant the city needed more taxpayers to maintain the LEVEL of services. But therein lies the fallacy of this tax base argument. If you bring in more people to pay taxes to maintain the services, then more people want those services and each citizen gets less anyway. No one acknowledges that second half of the equation. It's not like the new taxpayers don't want to use services, too.













